| 知识产权审判组织、法官及审判方式刍议 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 張廣良. 知识产权审判组织、法官及审判方式刍议[J]. 中国专利与商标, 2011, 0(2): 78-83 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 張廣良 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学; |
| |
| 摘 要： | 自改革开放以来，我国的知识产权司法保护取得了巨大成就，发挥了保护知识产权的主渠道作用。然而，在新形势下我国知识产权司法保护体系中的某些方面仍显薄弱，在知识产权审判组织的建设、知识产权法官专业素质的培养及审判方式的传承与创新等方面尚有较大的改进空间。笔者将结合我国知识产权司法保护的新形势，对此问题略陈管见。
|
| 关 键 词： | 知识产权法 审判 组织 保护体系 改革开放 专业素质 司法 |
Discussion on IP Judicial Institution,Judges and Ways to Hear IP Cases |
| |
| Zhang Guangliang Associate Professor of the Renmin University of China,Depute Managing Director of the Institute for International Intellectual Property of Peking University, part-time Professor of the US John Marshal Law School. Discussion on IP Judicial Institution,Judges and Ways to Hear IP Cases[J]. China Patents & Trademarks, 2011, 0(2): 78-83 |
| |
| Authors: | Zhang Guangliang Associate Professor of the Renmin University of China Depute Managing Director of the Institute for International Intellectual Property of Peking University part-time Professor of the US John Marshal Law School |
| |
| Affiliation: | Zhang Guangliang Associate Professor of the Renmin University of China,Depute Managing Director of the Institute for International Intellectual Property of Peking University,and part-time Professor of the US John Marshal Law School |
| |
| Abstract: | Ever since the reform and opening to the outside world, China has made tremendous achievements in the judicial protection of the intellectual property rights （IPR）, and the judicial protection plays the major role in the IPR protection. However, the judicial protection of the IPR is still insufficient in some aspects under the new situation in China, and there is much room for improvement in the construction of the IP judicial institution, improvement of the training and professional quality of IP judges, |
| |
| Keywords: | |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
