首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


On the time evolution of received citations,in different scientific fields: An empirical study
Institution:1. CNR-CERIS, National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Economic Research on Firm and Growth, via Real Collegio, 30, I-10024 Moncalieri (TO), Italy;2. University of Torino, Department of Chemistry, via P. Giuria, 7, I-10125 Torino, Italy;1. Instituto de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible Tides, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain;2. Departamento de Estadística, Investigación Operativa y Computación, Universidad de La Laguna, Spain;1. The Graduate School of Public Policy and Information Technology, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 172 Gongreung 2-dong, Nowon-gu, Seoul 139-746, Republic of Korea;2. Department of Systems Management Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, 300 Chunchun-dong, Jangan-gu, Kyunggi-do 440-746, Republic of Korea;1. SciTech Strategies, Inc., Albuquerque, NM 87122, USA;2. SciTech Strategies, Inc., Keene, NH 03431, USA;3. Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA;4. SciTech Strategies, Inc., Berwyn, PA 19312, USA;1. Bureau d’études et de recherches en science de l’information, 09 BP 477 Saint Michel, Cotonou, Benin;2. University of Antwerp, Institute for Education and Information Sciences, IBW, Venusstraat 35, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
Abstract:The time evolution of mean received citations is calculated on a sample of journals from two ISI subject categories (“Chemistry, multidisciplinary”, ISI Science Edition, and “Management”, ISI Social Science edition) with the use of an original methodology. Mean received citations are plotted against the time gap in years existing between publication of the cited article and received citations. For most Chemistry journals in the sample the maximum number of average received citations occurs two years after publication, and then a decrease is experimented. Some peculiar cases present a different trend. Management journals, conversely, do not present in most cases a peak of citations: average received citations instead grow from year of publication to the age of 10 years (maximum time gap studied). A subsample of journals show similar results for longer time series (up to 23 years). Medians of average received citations per year partly show a similar behavior. Results suggest that citedness follows very different trends in very different fields, and partly suggest why differences in Journal Impact Factor exist between different categories. At the end of the work conclusions are drawn, together with suggestions for future research.
Keywords:Mean received citations  Medians of citations  Scientific fields  Received citations trends  Chemistry  Management
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号