首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论唐代的文献辨伪与官方学术——以《孝经》孔、郑注真伪之辩为中心
引用本文:佟大群.论唐代的文献辨伪与官方学术——以《孝经》孔、郑注真伪之辩为中心[J].陕西教育学院学报,2014(6):91-95.
作者姓名:佟大群
作者单位:吉林省社会科学院历史研究所,吉林长春130033
摘    要:《孝经》孔、郑注,在流传过程中有失体统,自南朝以来,代有学者不断论争。开元初政,唐玄宗有感于《孝经》师说纷纭,颇不利于弘扬"孝道"的现实,命臣僚论辩《孝经》孔、郑注的真伪、优劣。刘知幾、司马贞等人,各抒己见而莫衷一是。唐玄宗基于不纠结于"小疵"而发挥"异说",不纠缠于"门派"而弘扬"大义"的考虑,诏令搁置真伪之论而并立学官,从而在推进经术统一、"以孝治国"的道路上,迈出了坚实的一步。

关 键 词:唐玄宗  孝经郑注  孝经孔传  真伪之辩  官方学术

The Debate about the Correctness of Remarks to Xiao Jing noted by Tang Scholars Kong Ying-da and Zhen Xuan
TONG Da-qun.The Debate about the Correctness of Remarks to Xiao Jing noted by Tang Scholars Kong Ying-da and Zhen Xuan[J].Journal of Shaanxi Institute of Education,2014(6):91-95.
Authors:TONG Da-qun
Institution:TONG Da-qun (The History Research Institute, Jilin Academy of Social Sciences, Changehun 130033, China)
Abstract:Since Chinese Southern Dynasties, there started the debate about the correctness oi remarks to Xiao Jing noted by Tang scholars Kong Ying--da and Zhen Xuan. At thebeginning of the Kaiyuan period, considering that it would be not convincible for "filial piety" spreading with so many different opinions of explaining Xiao Jing, the emperor Tang Xuan--zong asked scholars to study the systematical development of different explanation of Xiao Jing and therefore set up various subjects, which at the same time promoted the righteousness idea of "Ruling by Filial Piety".
Keywords:Tang Xuan--zong  the Kong's Notes  the Zheng's Notes  correctness debate  official academic study
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号