Teacher Exchange and Rotation is Not Equivalent to Partner Assistance

Abstract

Given that education quality has long lagged behind in China’s rural schools, one-way “partner assistance” no longer conforms to the new situation of integrated urban-rural governance and the equalization of public services. Only two-way “exchange and rotation” with full participation can truly support schools and teachers in disadvantaged areas. All teachers should participate in exchange and rotation to ensure a balanced allocation of resources and achieve equity in education. Achieving the goal of two-way exchange and rotation for both urban and rural areas requires scientific decision-making and step-by-step promotion. Moreover, prejudice and discrimination must be eliminated. Various supporting measures should also be included, such as guaranteeing the equitable and rational primary allocation of education resources, and addressing the issues of teacher transportation, housing, and children’s education. Other supporting measures include encouraging more diverse teachers to participate in exchange and rotation, and shifting the management center of gravity downward.