首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“性贿赂”入罪的司法解释问题探析
引用本文:孟庆华,朱博瀚.“性贿赂”入罪的司法解释问题探析[J].廊坊师范学院学报,2011,27(1):81-84.
作者姓名:孟庆华  朱博瀚
作者单位:河北大学,政法学院,河北,保定,071002
摘    要:"性贿赂"是"财产性利益"还是"非财产性利益",不能一概而论。对此,只有将"财产性利益"与"非财产性利益"的概念及其区别搞清,才能作出准确回答。司法解释虽然解决了部分"性贿赂"入罪,但由于司法解释自身所具有的局限性,却根本不可能完全解决"性贿赂"入罪问题。通过司法解释将刑法中"给予财物"扩张解释为"给予财物或者提供性服务",却不具有合理性。

关 键 词:性贿赂  财产性利益  非财产性利益

On Legislative Interpretation of "Sexual Bribery" as a Crime
MENG Qing-hua,ZHU Bo-han.On Legislative Interpretation of "Sexual Bribery" as a Crime[J].Journal of Langfang Teachers College,2011,27(1):81-84.
Authors:MENG Qing-hua  ZHU Bo-han
Institution:MENG Qing-hua,ZHU Bo-han(School of Politics and Law,Hebei University,Baoding Hebei 071002,China)
Abstract:There is no decisive opinion about whether sexual bribery is property interests or non-property interests.Only after a clear distinction between the two concepts will a correct answer be drawn out.Legislative interpretation,though it has partially solve the problem to categorize sexual bribery as a crime,cannot give a satifactory answer due to its own limitation.It is unreasonable to broaden the article of granting properties as granting perperties or providing sexual services.
Keywords:sexual bribery  property interests  non-property interests  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号