| 《文心雕龙》的《老》《庄》批评 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 高林广.《文心雕龙》的《老》《庄》批评[J].广播电视大学学报,2011(1):27-32,39. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 高林广 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 内蒙古师范大学,内蒙古,呼和浩特,010022 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 内蒙古自治区社科规划课题"《文心雕龙》文学史观疏鉴";项目 |
| |
| 摘 要： | <文心雕龙>评<老子>"以冠百氏"、"五千精妙",堪称真知灼见;而对于<庄子>,<文心雕龙>却将之列入"踳驳之类",评之为"华实过乎淫侈",斯乃肤浅之谈.此外,<文心雕龙>多借用或化用<老><庄>之义理、术语、事典及语辞等以评述作家作品,阐述文章创作的原则和方法,<老><庄>对<文心雕龙>理论体系的建构起到了重要作用.
|
| 关 键 词： | 《文心雕龙》 《老子》 《庄子》 批评 |
On The Criticism of Lao Tze and Zhuang Tze in Dragon Carving and the literary Mind |
| |
| GAO Lin-guang.On The Criticism of Lao Tze and Zhuang Tze in Dragon Carving and the literary Mind[J].Journal of TV University(Philosophy & Social Sciences),2011(1):27-32,39. |
| |
| Authors: | GAO Lin-guang |
| |
| Institution: | GAO Lin-guang(Inner Mongolia Normal University,Huhhot Inner Mongolia China 010022) |
| |
| Abstract: | In Dragon carving and the literary mind,Lao Tze was regarded as a classical work superior to the classical works of other schools and full of essence,also called a classical work of correct and penetrating views;but,in meanwhile,Zhuang Tze was included into rough works with luxurious and wasteful characteristics and also regarded as superficial writings.besides,Dragon carving and the literary mind borrowed skillfully some moral rules,terms,and even annals from the works mentioned above.by the way,it illustrated the rules and methods of works＇ creation.furthermore Lao Tze and Zhuang Tze play an very important role in establishing the theory system of The Criticism of Lao Tze and Zhuang Tze. |
| |
| Keywords: | Dragon carving and the literary mind Lao Tze Zhuang Tze Criticism |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
