Foreign-born academic scientists and engineers: producing more and getting less than their U.S.-born peers? |
| |
Authors: | Elizabeth A Corley and Meghna Sabharwal |
| |
Institution: | (1) School of Public Affairs, Arizona State University, 411 N. Central Avenue, Suite 450, Mail Code 3720, Phoenix, AZ 85004-0687, USA |
| |
Abstract: | The Chronicle of Higher Education recently reported that the number of doctoral degrees awarded in the U.S. rose 3.4 percent in 2004, largely because of an
increase in foreign students Smallwood (2005). Doctoral degrees rose 3.4% in 2004, survey finds. The Chronicle of Higher
Education, December 9, 2005]. Currently, 20.9 percent National Science Board (2003). The science and engineering workforce
realizing America’s potential. NSB, vol. 3, National Science Foundation] of all science and engineering faculty positions
at U.S. universities are held by foreign-born scientists (with even larger percentages in computer science and engineering)—and
we can expect higher numbers of foreign-born faculty at U.S. universities in the future. In this paper, we use 2001 Survey of Doctorate Recipients (SDR) data from the National Science Foundation to compare productivity levels, work satisfaction levels and career trajectories
of foreign-born scientists and U.S.-born scientists. The results indicate that foreign-born academic scientists and engineers
are more productive than their U.S.-born peers in all areas. Yet, average salaries and work satisfaction levels for foreign-born
scientists are lower than for U.S.-born scientists.
The use of NSF data does not imply NSF endorsement of the research methods or conclusions contained in this report. |
| |
Keywords: | science policy publication productivity scientific productivity research policy foreign-born work satisfaction survey |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|