| 试论明清内阁的地位差异 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 杜志明. 试论明清内阁的地位差异[J]. 廊坊师范学院学报, 2014, 0(2): 60-62 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 杜志明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]南开大学周恩来政府管理学院,天津300071 [2]安顺学院人文学院,贵州安顺561000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 明清两代同以内阁为中枢辅政机构，但地位和品秩有别。明代内阁委寄虽重，但仅系侍左右、备顾问的五品侍从机构。清王朝将内阁加以制度化和正规化，升其官秩为正一品。除此之外，二者的差别还表现在阁制、阁规以及内阁的运作方式等方面。而究其原因，实为明清两代特殊的政治环境所致。
|
| 关 键 词： | 明清 内阁 地位 差异 |
Differences of the Status of the Cabinet in the Ming and the Qing Dynasties |
| |
| DU Zhi-ming. Differences of the Status of the Cabinet in the Ming and the Qing Dynasties[J]. Journal of Langfang Teachers College, 2014, 0(2): 60-62 |
| |
| Authors: | DU Zhi-ming |
| |
| Affiliation: | DU Zhi-ming (1 Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China; 2 School of Humanities, A nshun College, A nshun Sichuan 561000, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The Ming and the Qing Dynasties took the Cabinet as a central assistant institution. But there are differences in the status and rank. The Cabinet of the Ming Dynasty was granted great importance; but they were a Grade-5 assistant institution with consultants. In the Qing Dynasty, the Cabinet was institutionalized and formalized and was graded the first official rank. In addition, the difference lies in the system, regulation and operation. The difference is caused by the different political circumstances of the Ming and the Qing Dynasties. |
| |
| Keywords: | the Ming and the Qing Dynasties the Cabinet status differences |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
