教育理论构造的两种理想模型

教育研究方法的正确交代与实际运用状态的不足,业已成为制约教育研究成果合理、正确、有效与否的主要矛盾。这表明存在着一个如何评价教育研究成果有效性或可靠性的重要问题,与之密切关联的问题就是如何合乎逻辑地构造教育理论。教育研究成果的评价至少涉及三条规则:观点-证据联结的可靠性;资料-解释联结的有效性;概念-命题联结的合理性。教育理论的构造大致可以归纳为两种理想模型:ABCDEF(理论检验)模型和CDEFBA(理论建构)模型。依据这种理想模型,将有利于恰当地评价某项教育研究的有效性或可靠性,并促进教育理论研究更成熟和更健康的发展。

Two Ideal Models To Construct Educational Theory

The deficiency of correct explanation and practice in the educational research method has been the main contradiction, which restricted the reasonableness, exactness and reliability of the production of the educational research. Thus, it is important to evaluate the validity and reliability of the productions what was close in contact with another question of constructing the education theory logically. There are no less than three rules related to the evaluation of the educational research productions: the reliability of view-evidence; the validity of the data-explanation: the reasonableness of the concept-proposition. Approximately, there are two ideal models to construct educational theory: ABCDEF (to validate theory) and CDEFBA (to construct theory) model. The ideal models are propitious to evaluate the validity or the reliability of a certain education research correctly, and help the educational theory research to develop more maturely and healthily.