首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

试论孟连傣族习惯法赋予拾得者权利的合理性——傣族习惯法研究之一
引用本文:李小华. 试论孟连傣族习惯法赋予拾得者权利的合理性——傣族习惯法研究之一[J]. 楚雄师范学院学报, 2011, 26(4): 38-42,90
作者姓名:李小华
作者单位:中央民族大学,北京,100081
基金项目:中央民族大学"211工程"三期创新人才培养项目
摘    要:孟连傣族习惯法规定了拾得者一定的义务,同时也规定了拾得者的报酬请求权及一定条件下可以取得遗失物所有权的权利。这些规定与《民法通则》及《物权法》的规定很不相同,这两部法律均否认了拾得者的报酬请求权及取得遗失物所有权的权利。两相比较,孟连傣族习惯法的规定更为合理,既符合伦理学中人性类型的相对数量统计性规律,也符合经济学原理;同时,从实际效果来看,赋予拾得者这些权利取得的效果也更好。事实上,正因为法律规定的不合理,在我国的司法实践中,对拾得遗失物也未严格按法律的规定处理。

关 键 词:孟连傣族习惯法  拾得者权利  合理性

On the Rationality of the Rights to the Finders by Menglian Dai People' s Common Law-Dai People's Common Law Studies I
LI Xiao-hua. On the Rationality of the Rights to the Finders by Menglian Dai People' s Common Law-Dai People's Common Law Studies I[J]. journal of chuxiong normal university, 2011, 26(4): 38-42,90
Authors:LI Xiao-hua
Affiliation:LI Xiao-hua(Minzu University of China,Beijing 100081,China)
Abstract:Provided by Menglian Dai People’s Common Law,besides certain obligations,compensation claim and the rights to get lost property ownership should be offered to the finders under certain conditions.These rules are very different from those in General Principles of the Civil Law and the Property Law of the P.R.C,which deny the rights to the finders.Compared with them,the rules in Menglian Dai People’s Common Law seem to be more reasonable in that they are human and economical.In fact,how to deal with finding the lost property is not carried out strictly in judicial practice in accordance with the law because some of the rules in General Principles of the Civil Law are unreasonable.
Keywords:Menglian Dai People’s Common Law  the finder’s rights  rationality
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号