Processing and recall of seductive details in scientific text |
| |
Authors: | Stephen Lehman Gregory Schraw Matthew T. McCrudden Kendall Hartley |
| |
Affiliation: | aDepartment of Psychology, Utah State University, 2810 Old Main Hill, Logan, UT 84322-2810, USA;bDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Nevada, 4505 Maryland Parkway, Box 453003, Las Vegas, NV 89154-3003, USA;cFoundations and Secondary Education, College of Education and Human Services, 4567 St. Johns Bluff Road, South Jacksonville, FL 32224-2676, USA |
| |
Abstract: | This study examined how seductive details affect on-line processing of a technical, scientific text. In Experiment 1, each sentence from the experimental text was rated for interest and importance. Participants rated seductive details as being more interesting but less important than main ideas. In Experiment 2, we examined the effect of seductive details on reading time and learning. Seductive details reduced the amount of time readers spent reading base text sentences, and hindered recall of important ideas and deeper processing as measured by an essay task. These findings extend previous research [Harp, S. & Mayer, R. E. (1997). Role of interest in learning from scientific text and illustrations: on the distinction between emotional interest and cognitive interest. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 92–102; Harp, S. F., & Mayer, R. E. (1998). How seductive details do their damage: a theory of cognitive interest in science learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 441–434.] to suggest that the negative effects of seductive details’ on comprehension were due to a combination of reduced attentional allocation and disruption of text coherence. |
| |
Keywords: | Seductive details Text comprehension Situational interest |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|