中美数学课程标准：比较与阐释

将美国数学课程标准（AMS）作为被比较对象，通过对中美数学课程标准比较分析，发现AMS具有理论性，是一个说理性材料而中国数学课程标准（CMS）具有操作性，是一个陈述性材料；AMS具有立体性，而CMS具有平面性；AMS是一个数学教学“引擎”，而CMS是一个数学知识“仓库”；AMS重视数学教学活动过程的引导和预防，而CMS则重视知识，重视有形的可测物，忽视无形的不可测物，从形式上看仍有“教学大纲”的影子．

Comparison and Interpretation of Mathematics Curriculum Standards Between Chinese and American

By comparing mathematics curriculum standards between Chinese and American, the paper finds that American mathematics curriculum standards（AMS） is characteristic of theory,is materials of reasoning,but Chinese mathematics curriculum standards（CMS） is characteristic of operability,is ma- terials of declarative. AMS is multi-dimensionality ,but CMS is planarity. AMS is the engine of mathematics teaching,but CMS is the warehouse of mathematical knowledge. AMS emphasizes the guide and prevention in the process of mathematics teaching, but CMS emphasizes knowledge and tangible object, neglects intangible object, still has the shadow of syllabus from the forms.