| 刘勰“虚静”说两种渊源论辨 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张吉兵. 刘勰“虚静”说两种渊源论辨[J]. 江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2005, 38(4): 3-6 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张吉兵 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 黄冈师范学院学报,湖北,黄冈,438000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 传统注释家主刘勰虚静说源出老庄,王元化认为<荀子·解蔽篇>的"虚壹而静"才是其渊源.最近,青年学者李金松博士等著文,从知识论的角度对原有材料进行了新的阐发和解读,对王说提出不同意见,维护传统观点.本文认为李文的分析方法和认识见解有欠缜密.笔者赞同王元化的观点.
|
| 关 键 词： | 虚静说 渊源论 王元化 李金松等 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-579(2005)04-0003-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-03-15 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-03-15 |
Discussion of Two Origins on Liuxie's Theory of "Xujing" |
| |
| ZHANG Ji-bing. Discussion of Two Origins on Liuxie's Theory of "Xujing"[J]. Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2005, 38(4): 3-6 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Ji-bing |
| |
| Abstract: | Liuxie,whose theory of "Xujing" was from Laozhuang,was a traditional annotation expert,Wangyuanhua thinks "Xuyierjing" in Xunzi.Jiebipian is its origin.Young scholar Doc.Lijinsong has written articles to elucidate and explain the original materials from the angle of theory of knowledge recently,disagrees with Wangyuanhua,and maintains troditional opinions.The paper thinks Wangyuanhua's methods of analysis is and views lack carefulness.The author agrees with Wangyuanhua. |
| |
| Keywords: | theory of " Xujing" ,theory of origin,Wangyuanhua,Lijinsong |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
