首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Government as a platform: Intergovernmental participation for public services in the Russian Federation
Institution:1. National Research University Higher School of Economics, Str. Myasnitskaya 11, Moscow 101000, Russia;2. Arizona State University, 411 N. Central, Suite 450, Phoenix, AZ 3720, USA;1. National Research University Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg, Russia;2. ITMO University, St. Petersburg, Russia;1. Department of Information Science, University at Albany-SUNY, Albany, NY, USA;2. Department of Public Administration and Policy, University at Albany- SUNY, Albany, NY, USA;3. Center for Collaborative HIV Research in Practice and Policy, Albany, NY, USA;1. Indian Institute of Management Shillong, Meghalaya, India;2. IMT Nagpur, Maharashtra, India;3. Emerging Markets Research Centre (EMaRC), School of Management, Room #323, Swansea University, Bay Campus, Fabian Bay, Swansea SA1 8EN, Wales, UK;4. Department of Management, Symbiosis Institute of Business Management, Pune & Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, Maharashtra, India;5. IMS Unison University, Dehradun, India
Abstract:Government as a Platform (GaaP) has been advocated in multiple countries, and most research has concentrated on collaboration at the national level. In the Russian Federation, universal participation of regional and municipal authorities on the public services platform Gosuslugi.ru. is a priority intended to address regional disparities as well as greater efficiency. Russia serves as a case study to explore the extent to which it possible to use platforms for intergovernmental management - to effectively integrate all regions on a single platform, despite wide differences in capabilities and needs. We examine the case of Gosuslugi.ru through the technology enactment framework (Fountain, 2001). While the literature on platforms emphasizes loose coordination or orchestration, the technology enactment framework suggests that in systems with a high degree of centralization, such as Russia, platforms will be more centralized and top-down. We show the problems a highly centralized approach creates for implementation in the context of wide disparities, but the modularity and adaptability of platforms may also allow for more decentralization through choice and varied levels of participation. An open question is whether such flexibility will be allowed going forward. The technology enactment framework has been used primarily to analyze microlevel behavior within organizations. Considering macro-level institutions such as federalism can enhance use of the technology enactment framework across countries, and this case may have implications for intergovernmental participation on platforms in other nations.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号