Complex fraction comparisons and the natural number bias: The role of benchmarks |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. KMRC — Knowledge Media Research Center, Tuebingen, Germany;2. Department of Psychology, Eberhard Karls University, Tuebingen, Germany |
| |
Abstract: | People are often better at comparing fractions when the larger fraction has the larger rather than the smaller natural number components. However, there is conflicting evidence about whether this “natural number bias” occurs for complex fraction comparisons (e.g., 23/52 vs. 11/19). It is also unclear whether using benchmarks such as 1/2 or 1/4 enhances performance and reduces the bias (e.g., 11/19 > 1/2 and 23/52 < 1/2, hence 11/19 > 23/52). We asked 107 adults to solve complex fraction comparisons that did or did not afford using benchmarks, and we assessed response time and accuracy. We found a reverse bias (i.e., smaller components—larger fraction) that was greater among participants with lower mathematics experience. Fractions' proximity to 0 or 1 facilitated performance and decreased bias; effects of other benchmarks were nonsignificant. These results challenge the generality of the natural number bias in fraction comparison and highlight its variability. |
| |
Keywords: | Fraction magnitudes Natural number bias Strategy use Dual processes |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|