《国家学生体质健康标准》与《学生体质健康标准(试行方案)》比较

通过对3604名大学生进行《学生体质健康标准(试行方案)》与《国家学生体质健康标准》的比较研究,分析了《新标准》在测试项目、权重系数、评分标准和评价等级等方面的实用性和科学性.研究表明,《新标准》在测试项目上仍然存在分类不清,选测项目相关度不高的问题.《新标准》调整了权重系数和评分标准,对大学生提出了更高的要求,可以更好地调动学生锻炼的积极性,达到增强体质的目的.另外,《新标准》中肺活量体重指数、立定跳远的提高幅度较大,学生在短期内无法达到要求,需要做进一步的调整.

Comparative Study of National Students Constitutional Health Criterion and Students Constitutional Health Criterion (on trial)

A comparative study of Student Physical Health Standards（on trial）（hereinafter referred to as the old standard）and National Student Fitness Standard（hereinafter referred to as the new standard）is conducted among the 3604college students in terms of the practicability and scientificalness concerning the test items,the weight coefficients,scoring criteria and evaluation of grade etc.,in the new standard.Studies have shown that the new standardis still blamed for its unclear classification and poor relevance between the test items.The new standard has adjusted the weight coefficients and the criteria for grading and puts forward a higher demand on college students so as to mobilize students’enthusiasm for sports and thus to enhance their physical constitution.The only fly in the ointment is that the new standard sets too high a criteria for the spiro-index and standing long jump,which is too tough a standard for students to reach and is thus in need of adjustment.