主权的法理分析与台湾问题

主权是一种最高权力.作为权力,它也像其他的无形或非物质利益一样,只是权利即法律上充分必要资格的对象或客体.权力本身不是权利.作为利益,权力和主权可以成为占有的对象或客体,但占有不等于所有,无权占有根本不算"有".想闹独立的人宣称台湾已"有"主权,是主权独立的"国家".这在法理上是不通的.作为中国的一部分,即中华人民共和国的一个特别政治区,台湾没有国内、国际公法上的权利和独立法律人格,因而没有主权,也不可能是主权国家.

An analysis of sovereignty and Taiwan problems in light of jurisprudence

Sovereignty is a kind of power.As power,like all other invisible or immaterial interests,it is but the object of right which can be defined as necessary and sufficient entitlement in law.Powers themselves are not rights.As interests,power and sovereignty can be the object of occupation,but occupation in law does not mean owning,while occupation without rights is certainly not owning.Some independence seekers say that Taiwan is a sovereign and independent state,and that PRC has no right to claim sovereignty over it.That is nonsense in Jurisprudence.Being a part of China,i.e.a special political area of the PRC,Taiwan has no rights and no independent legal personality both innational and international public laws,and thus cannot be regarded as a sovereign state in legal terms.