| 论缔约过失责任与不作为侵权责任的合理界分 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郜名扬,钱凯. 论缔约过失责任与不作为侵权责任的合理界分[J]. 安徽广播电视大学学报, 2006, 0(1): 10-14 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郜名扬 钱凯 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 吉林大学,法学院,吉林,长春,130012
2. 安徽广播电视大学,蚌埠分校,安徽,蚌埠,233000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 缔约过失责任是为了维护缔约过程中的信赖利益而创设的独立的民事责任制度，其民法理论根源在于诚实信用与公平原则。不作为侵权责任与作为侵权责任相对应，关注的是作为义务被违反时的权利救济问题，其民法理论根源在于诚实信用与公序良俗原则。探求两种制度存在的更深层次的法理根源，则是对法律与道德关系的追问。然而，两种责任的目的与价值并不相同。因此，合理厘定二者的界限，避免不必要的竞合十分重要。
|
| 关 键 词： | 过失责任 侵权责任 合同义务 注意义务 信赖利益 维持利益 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-6021（2006）01-0010-05 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-10-25 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-10-25 |
On the Reasonable Division of Liability for Negligence in Contracting and Liability for Tort by Non-acting |
| |
| GAO Ming-yang,QIAN Kai. On the Reasonable Division of Liability for Negligence in Contracting and Liability for Tort by Non-acting[J]. Journal of Anhui Television University, 2006, 0(1): 10-14 |
| |
| Authors: | GAO Ming-yang QIAN Kai |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. School of Law, Jilin University, Changchun 130012,China; 2. Bengbu Branch, Anhui TV University,Bengbu 233000,China |
| |
| Abstract: | As a separate liability,liability for negligence in contracting is for protecting trust benefit in concluding a treaty,it's theory bases are the principle of faithfulness,credit and the principle of equity.Compared with liability for tort by active act,liability for tort by non-acting is to protect rights when acting obligation is breached,its theory bases are the principle of faithfulness and credit and pinciple of public order and kind custom.The legal theoretical source of the two kind of liabilities is the relation of law and morals.However,they have respective purposes and value,so,it is important to divide them reasonably and avoide their unnecessary concurrence. |
| |
| Keywords: | liability for negligence,liability for tort contract duty duty of care reliance interest inherent interest |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
