| 论不安抗辩权 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 田宇阳. 论不安抗辩权[J]. 商丘职业技术学院学报, 2002, 1(2): 59-60 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 田宇阳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 商丘广播电视大学,河南,商丘,476000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 不安抗辩权制度的设立,对维护交易秩序、保障交易安全起了积极作用。但我国《合同法》对此制度规定过于简略,缺乏可操作性,有必要加以完善。不安抗辩权制度与《合同法》规定的另一制度—预期违约制度存在着明显区别,它们是各自独立、相互补充的关系。
|
| 关 键 词： | 不安抗辩 操作性 完善 预期违约 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-8127(2002)02-0059-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002-02-19 |
On the Right of Uneasy Counterargument |
| |
| TIAN Yu-yang. On the Right of Uneasy Counterargument[J]. Journal of Shangqiu Vocational and Technical College Journal of Shangqiu Vocational and Technical College Journal of Shangqiu Vocational and Technical College, 2002, 1(2): 59-60 |
| |
| Authors: | TIAN Yu-yang |
| |
| Abstract: | Establishing the system of the right of uneasy counterplea plays a positive role on defending trade order and ensuring trade safety. But Chinese Law about Contracts about this system is very simple and short of operatability. So it is necessary to perfect it. The system of the right of uneasycounterargument is clear different from the other system in Law about Contracts--break a contract expectantly. Their relations are independent andsupplementary. |
| |
| Keywords: | uneasy counterargument operatability perfect break a contract expectantly |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
