Praising and correcting: prospective teachers investigate their teacherly talk |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Strasbourg Teaching Hospital, France;2. UMR-S 1121 Inserm, “Biomatériaux et Bioingénierie”, Strasbourg, France;3. Department of Pediatrics, Strasbourg Teaching Hospital, France;4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of Haguenau, France;5. Department of Pediatrics, Hospital of Haguenau, France;6. Department of Public Health, Strasbourg Teaching Hospital, France;7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Toulouse Teaching Hospital, France;1. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia;2. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia;3. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia;4. Division of Neuropathology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia;1. Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York;2. Ronald O. Perelman Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York |
| |
Abstract: | Despite recent calls for teachers to promote and increase students’ communication and discussion in their classrooms, prospective teachers have limited opportunities to explore issues of classroom talk during their teacher preparation programs. In this study, prospective teachers attending a mathematics methods course were encouraged to attend to and investigate their developing teacherly talk through a letter writing exchange with school students. This paper reports on their tendency to respond to the correct answers with praise and to supply the answers when students reached an incorrect result. It explores the ways in which they began to interrogate and problematize such practices and to consider alternative forms of teacher responses to students’ right and wrong answers. Features of the course's field-related experience and the teacher educators’ interventions that promoted and supported the preservice teachers’ investigations are also discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|