首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

再谈《公莫舞》的研究——兼评姚小鸥《洛道五丈渡汲水》
引用本文:马世年.再谈《公莫舞》的研究——兼评姚小鸥《洛道五丈渡汲水》[J].西北师大学报,2002,39(3):24-30.
作者姓名:马世年
作者单位:西北师范大学文学院,甘肃兰州730070
摘    要:姚小鸥《洛道五丈渡汲水》一,已背离了正常的学术争鸣与批评。该对赵逵夫先生关于《公莫舞》的研究作了严厉指丽,谓其“抄袭”、“剽窃”杨公骥先生的研究成果,但事实却并非如此,本从《公莫舞》的研究史,赵、杨研究的比较,以及赵的贡献与其所遵循的学术规范等方面,对该予以反驳,并论及其在学术批评方面的缺失。

关 键 词:《公莫舞》  研究史  学术批评  学术规范
文章编号:1001-9162(2002)03-0024-07
修稿时间:2002年3月10日

Rediscussing the Research on Gong Mo Wu--Also Commenting on Yao Xiao-ou's Crossing the Jishui River along the Five-zhang-wide Road to Luoyang
MA Shi-nian.Rediscussing the Research on Gong Mo Wu--Also Commenting on Yao Xiao-ou's Crossing the Jishui River along the Five-zhang-wide Road to Luoyang[J].Journal of the Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences),2002,39(3):24-30.
Authors:MA Shi-nian
Abstract:The article,Crossing the Jishui River along the Five-zhang-wide Road to Luoyang,written by YAO Xiao-ou,has deviated from the normal academic contention and criticism.It is in this composition that Mr. ZHAO Kui-fu is severely accused of his research on Gong Mo Wu,his findings being denounced as"borrowing indiscriminately from","plagiarizing"Mr.YANG gong-ji's achievements in research.But this is not true.The present article is going to refute those accusations in that article of YAO's with evidence in the history of research into Gong Mo WU,with a comparison between ZHAO-s and YANG-s researches,ZHAo-s contribection to scientific research on the subject,and the academic norm to be observed,etc.,and in addition,to deal in general with the state of being in want of academic crilicism,etc..
Keywords:Gong Mo Wu  history of research  academic criticism  academic norm
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号