| 解读"有意味的形式" |
| |
| 引用本文： | 潘繁生. 解读"有意味的形式"[J]. 淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2001, 23(1): 126-130 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 潘繁生 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 淮海工学院,中文系,江苏,连云港,222005 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 凡是用来恰如其分地表现、传达或寄托艺术家主体内在生命并富于创造的形式即为"有意味的形式".克莱夫·贝尔在其<艺术论>中造成自身理论逻辑矛盾的一个根本原因,在于没有分清何谓"形似",何谓"写实".
|
| 关 键 词： | " 有意味的形式" 反写实 变形 抽象 主观创造 内在真实 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-8444(2001)01-0126-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000-09-16 |
Interpretation of the"Significant Form" |
| |
| PAN Fan sheng. Interpretation of the"Significant Form"[J]. Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College(Social Sciences Edition), 2001, 23(1): 126-130 |
| |
| Authors: | PAN Fan sheng |
| |
| Abstract: | The form which is creative and can be used to express and convey the artist's inner life in an appropriate way is called the "significant form". A fundamental cause for the contradiction in Clive Bell's theory in his own works, "On Art", lies in his failure in telling form similarity from realistic writing. |
| |
| Keywords: | significant form" ,anti realistic writing,transformation,abstraction,subjective creation,inner truthfulness |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
