| 反拨·坚守·超越《希望》书评解析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张玲丽. 反拨·坚守·超越《希望》书评解析[J]. 涪陵师范学院学报, 2007, 23(1): 142-146 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张玲丽 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 吉林大学 文学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 20世纪40年代是现代文学发展的重要阶段,不同的文学观点互相碰撞交织,而文学刊物为其提供了重要的平台。《希望》作为当时极为重要的刊物,显示出异质色彩。而其中的书评形式的批评着眼点是明确的,他们试图树立新型的文学思想。在批评过程中,同时显示出某种程度的思维狭隘的倾向。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《希望》 客观主义 主体性 |
| 文章编号： | 1672-366X(2007)01-0142-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-10-27 |
Challenge, Persistence and Transcendence-Interpreting the Book Reviews in Hope |
| |
| ZHANG Ling-li. Challenge, Persistence and Transcendence-Interpreting the Book Reviews in Hope[J]. JOurnal of Fuling Teachers College, 2007, 23(1): 142-146 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Ling-li |
| |
| Abstract: | 1940s is an important stage in the development of modern literature when different ideas collided and interweaved with each other. The literature periodicals provided platform for it. The magazine Hope was especially striking for its importance at that time. The book reviews contained in the magazine had definite critical points. The critics tried to establish a new type of literary thought. However, in their criticizing course, they displayed a tendency of narrow mind. |
| |
| Keywords: | Hope objectivism subjectiveness |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
