首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


We reap what we sew: perpetuating biblical illiteracy in new English Religious Studies exams and the proof text binary question
Authors:Robert A. Bowie  Richard Coles
Affiliation:1. Director of National Institute for Christian Education Research, Canterbury Christ Church University, Canterbury, UKbob.bowie@canterbury.ac.uk;3. Head of Religious Studies, The Park School, Yeovil, UK
Abstract:ABSTRACT

This article draws on three sources of evidence that together indicate hermeneutical weaknesses in exam courses on Christianity in English Religious Education (RE). It scrutinises a single exam paper and an associated text book from a recent authorised course. It conceptually explores features of a new style of long Religious Studies (RS) exam question that is commonly set for the majority of students studying for a RS qualification at 15–16 years old. It combines these documentary sources with a focus group interview of teachers in the first year of teaching the new GCSE Religious Studies. The findings from the document analysis, conceptual analysis and focus group interview, together concur that there is a problem related to the use of fragmentary texts and the promotion of a particularly propositional conception of religion. These features are structured in by systemic elements. A small proportion of students follow text-based GCSE routes include a more detailed study of Biblical texts but the majority of 15–16-year-old students do not and so are exposed to this problem. These weaknesses could be ‘designed out’ of exams with smarter questions and mitigated against by curriculum content that specified the study of how texts are interpreted, as well as teacher expertise in the teaching and practise of hermeneutics.
Keywords:Bible  Christianity  hermeneutics  exams  proof-text  binary questions
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号