当代西方制度世界主义与文化世界主义辨析

制度和文化世界主义具备内在关联,它们都倡导和关注个体及人类的共同利益与价值。作为当代西方世界主义的两种研究类别,制度和文化世界主义呈现出了各自独有的哲学渊源、核心倡议和生成路径。在哲学渊源上,制度世界主义吸收了斯多葛学派的精髓,而文化世界主义则在某种程度上倒向了犬儒主义。在核心倡议上,制度世界主义关注民族国家的解构与重组,并希望打造多层次全球治理体系与全球新秩序,而文化世界主义则更加关注个体的文化选择、多元文化并存以及对文化差异的包容。在生成路径上,欧洲一体化的成功、现代性的反思以及新制度主义的崛起构成了制度世界主义的实践和理论基础,而文化世界主义则是在移民和文化公民身份理论的作用下迎来了复兴的契机。尽管如此,制度和文化世界主义却在实现个体价值关怀、塑造全球文化与全球秩序方面保持了一致。

Analysis of Contemporary Western Institutional Cosmopolitanism and Cultural Cosmopolitanism

Institutionaland cultural cosmopolitanism are inter-related, by advocating and concerning for the common interests and values of individuals and human beings at one time. As two research approaches of contemporary western cosmopolitanism, institutional and cultural show their own unique philosophical origins, main proposals and generated paths respectively. From the perspectiveof philosophical origins, institutional cosmopolitanism absorbed the essence of Stoicism, while cultural cosmopolitanism turned to cynicism to some extent. On the main proposals, institutional cosmopolitanism focuses on the deconstruction and reorganization of nation-state, and hopes to build a multi-level global governance system in order to form a new global order, but yet cultural cosmopolitanism pays more attention to individual cultural choice, coexistence of multi cultures and tolerance of cultural differences. On the path of generating, the success of EU, the reflection of modernity, as well as the rise of new institutionalism, constitute the practice and theoretical basis of institutionalcosmopolitanism, while cultural cosmopolitanism is brought about by the theory of immigration and theory of cultural citizenship. Nevertheless, institutional and cultural cosmopolitanism are consistent in realizing individual value care and shaping global culture and global order all along.