首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中国现代文学批评史的分期及存在的问题
引用本文:韩伟.中国现代文学批评史的分期及存在的问题[J].唐山师范学院学报,2010,32(1):36-38.
作者姓名:韩伟
作者单位:南京大学,中文系,江苏,南京210093;哈尔滨师范大学,中文系,黑龙江,哈尔滨,150080
摘    要:对现代文学批评史的时间跨度进行界定是关系到如何看待现代文学和现代文学批评的重要问题。温儒敏、许道明、黄曼君的三种代表性的分期模式是分别从文学、社会学和文化学三个角度进行的。而众多分期模式的存在与学者对现代性的理解、对话语权的争夺,以及对现代文学/文学批评的合法性的认识是密不可分的。对文学批评史分期的不断争论也最终推动了文学批评史研究走向纵深。

关 键 词:文学批评史  分期  悖论

The Staging of the History of Chinese Modern Literary Criticism and Related Problems
HAN Wei.The Staging of the History of Chinese Modern Literary Criticism and Related Problems[J].Journal of Tangshan Teachers College,2010,32(1):36-38.
Authors:HAN Wei
Institution:HAN Wei (1. Department of Chinese Language , Literature,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093,China,2. Department of Chinese Language , Literature,Harbin Normal University,Harbin 150080,China)
Abstract:To define the time span of modern literary criticism history is an important thing which is related to how to understand modern literature and modern literary criticism. The views of Wen Ru-Min,Xu Tao-ming,Huang Man-jun are three typical staging models which are respectively from the perspectives of literature,sociology and culture. The presence of a number of staging models are related to the understanding of modernity,the struggle for discourse right,as well as the legitimacy of modern literature / litera...
Keywords:the literary criticism history  stages  paradox  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号