首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

档案鉴定工作几个问题的重新思考
引用本文:刘晓春,王雁.档案鉴定工作几个问题的重新思考[J].档案学研究,2015,29(3):28-32.
作者姓名:刘晓春  王雁
作者单位:湖北省档案局 武汉 430071
摘    要:本文针对“档案鉴定”这个老生常谈的话题,就其中的档案价值鉴定、开放鉴定、数字化鉴定等进行了积极的探索和理性思考。针对档案保管期限,建议将一直以来实行的“三分法”改为永久和定期10年“两分法”;针对档案存毁鉴定,主张对经鉴定拟剔除的档案原则上不销毁,可考虑其直接进入文物市场流通;针对档案的开放鉴定,建议应与政府信息公开条例接轨,取消30年禁锢期限,可将档案分为主动公开的、依申请公开的、不予公开的三类;针对档案数字化鉴定,提出档案数字化的根本目的是方便利用,应将扫描对象区分为扫描件和不扫描件,以剔除冗余信息,节约成本并提高工作效率。一己之见,期作引玉之“砖”。

关 键 词:档案  鉴定工作  思考  

Rethinking about Several Questions on Archival Appraisal
Xiaochun Liu,Yan Wang.Rethinking about Several Questions on Archival Appraisal[J].Archives Science Study,2015,29(3):28-32.
Authors:Xiaochun Liu  Yan Wang
Abstract:This paper is actively exploring and rationally thinking on archival value appraisal,open access identification and identification for digitization. For the archival retention period,the Tripartite Division method that has been implemented should be changed into the Dichotomy Method,the permanent and regular 10 years. For the identification of preserving archives or destroying,the archives identified to be destroyed could be considered to enter the cultural relics market rather than being destroyed forthwith. For the open access identification of archives,it should be in line with the Decree of Government Information Openness. For the archival digitization identification,the convenience of use is the fundamental purpose of digitizing archives. So the archives should be divided into the scanning or not scanning,in order to eliminate the redundant information,save the cost and improve the work efficiency.
Keywords:Archives  Appraisal  Thinking  
点击此处可从《档案学研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《档案学研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号