| 两种大师与“第三种批评” |
| |
| 引用本文： | 傅金祥. 两种大师与“第三种批评”[J]. 滨州学院学报, 2001, 17(1): 35-36 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 傅金祥 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 滨州师范专科学校,山东,滨州,256604 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 仅仅阐释经典、繁琐考证是治学的误区 ,是埋葬天才的坟墓。这正是中国传统学术文化的悲剧所在。“第三种批评方法”倡导独立的思想和学术品格 ,可谓医治传统痼疾的良药
|
| 关 键 词： | 阐释 创造 第三种批评 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-2980(2001)01-0035-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2000-10-02 |
Two Kinds of Great Masters and "The Third Kind of Criticism" |
| |
| FU Jin?xiang. Two Kinds of Great Masters and "The Third Kind of Criticism"[J]. Journal of Binzhou University, 2001, 17(1): 35-36 |
| |
| Authors: | FU Jin?xiang |
| |
| Abstract: | Merely explaining classical works and doing complicated research in academic purpuits are mistaken and also burry real talents. It's the tragedy for Chinese traditional culture.“The Third Kind of way of Criticism”which proposes independent thinking and academic style is considered the best solution to the above?mentioned problem. |
| |
| Keywords: | explanation creation the third kind of criticism |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
