对天京变乱责任问题的辩证探讨

1856年9月的天京变乱,谁应负其主要责任,目前史学界说法不一。文学界普遍认为杨秀清逼封万岁,首先激化与洪秀全的矛盾,应承担天京变乱的主要责任,论文对此提出质疑。杨秀清的逼封虽然成为天京变乱的导火线,但在此之后的变乱过程中,他处于被动地位,成为受害者,是矛盾的次要方面,不应对变乱承担主要责任。洪秀全自始至终控制着变乱事态的发展,使变乱按其计划进行,成为变乱的获胜者和最大受益者,是矛盾的主要方面。因此,洪秀全应承担天京变乱的主要责任。

Dialectical Exploration about Responsibility of Tianjing Turmoil

At present the history field has different views about who was responsible to Tianjing Turmoil in Sept,1856. The history field believes that Yang Xiuqing,who forced Hong Xuiquan to make him emperor and sharpened the contradictions with Hong Xiuquan,should be responsible for Tianjing Turmoil.But the thesis,puts forward query.Yang Xiuqing's force was the blasting fuse to Tianjing's Turmoil,but he waw in a passive status and a victim in the lasting process of Turmoil And we can conclude that he is the minor part of contradictions and shouldn't be responsible for the turmoil. Hong Xiuquan,who controlled the development of turmoil from start to end and made it grow freely,was the best winner and beneficiary and the major part of contradictions.So he should bear the whole responsibility.