| 明代复古与创新的理论根源 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 邓程.明代复古与创新的理论根源[J].辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),2003,26(4):66-70. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 邓程 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国广播电视出版社,传记编辑室,北京,100866 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 严羽虽然提倡复古,实际又开了后世创新理论的方便之门。明以后诗论有两大派：以禅宗“悟”为中心概念一派,以李梦阳“法”为中心概念的一派,前主创新,对语言不信任的程度远过于道家对语言的不信任。后则强调复古。但这两派均没有抓住意象这一中心问题,这是两派均告失败的根源。
|
| 关 键 词： | 复古 创新 禅悟 法 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-1751(2003)04-0066-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年8月30日 |
On the Theoretical Origins of Restoring Ancient Ways and Innovation in Ming Dynasty |
| |
| DENG Cheng.On the Theoretical Origins of Restoring Ancient Ways and Innovation in Ming Dynasty[J].Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition),2003,26(4):66-70. |
| |
| Authors: | DENG Cheng |
| |
| Abstract: | Although Yan Yu advocated restoring ancient ways, he actually Opened the door of establishing of innovation theories for the younger gererations. After Ming Dynasty, poetry criticism was divided into two schools: the concept school of dhyana with "WU" ( enlightened) as core meaning; the other school of Li Meng-yang with the law as core meaning. The former maintained innovation, with far more disbelief in language than the Dao Family. The latter, on the contrary, stressed on restoring ancient ways. However, neither of them could see the core issue of image, resulting in their failure. |
| |
| Keywords: | restoring ancient ways innovation "Wu" (enlightenment) law |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
