首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Mind the Gap: Appropriate Evolutionary Perspectives Toward the Integration of the Sciences and Humanities
Authors:Leslie L Heywood  Justin R Garcia  David Sloan Wilson
Institution:1. Department of English, and Institute for Evolutionary Studies, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, 13902-6000, USA
2. Departments of Anthropology and Biological Sciences, and Institute for Evolutionary Studies, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, 13902-6000, USA
3. Departments of Biological Sciences and Anthropology, and Institute for Evolutionary Studies, Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, 13902-6000, USA
Abstract:Although Darwinism has gained a foothold in the social sciences, in the humanities, with a few exceptions, it is still largely rejected—not, as some would claim, because humanists are all radical poststructuralists who deny that material reality exists, but rather because, with notable exceptions, Darwinists who work within the humanities have adopted a trenchant “us against them,” in-group/out-group mentality that has done a good deal more harm than good. In order for evolution to be effectively taught as part of a humanistic approach to literature and art, a more productive, truly “two way” approach is necessary, and must do more than impose the scientific method on the humanities. When this kind of imposition occurs, the humanities are treated only as subject matter, thereby discounting historical and interpretive research that is invaluable to scientists and claims they might make in these areas. This paper claims that for evolution to function as a paradigm with true explanatory power across disciplines, scientifically oriented evolutionists need training in humanistic methodologies just as much as humanistically oriented evolutionists need training in the scientific method. Evolution, in this context, becomes not the paradigm that can explain everything from a scientific point of view but rather the beginnings of a conversation about lower and upper level questions, and how these questions might inform and enrich each other’s research.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号