首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

历史与现实中的学术剽窃
引用本文:刘东.历史与现实中的学术剽窃[J].徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,38(4):10-28.
作者姓名:刘东
作者单位:清华大学国学研究院,北京,100084
摘    要:鉴于种种剽窃行径、特别是东窗事发后的乌贼战术,极度污染了学界的基本生态,应从历史语境的转移中进行澄清。古代社会并不笼统地容许文字挪用,相反,有可能比现代更为严酷,关键看它是否会为相关的特定个体谋得既在预期之中、又在情理之外的名誉或利益。而到了现代社会,鼓励知识创新的个人专利制度,更鉴于学术剽窃带来的种种危害,将它视作罪名独立、不可抵赖的过失。所以,尽管它仍属于道德罪过,学界也必须基于自清原则,让剽窃者得不偿失,让欲为者望而生畏。否则,整个学界的基本规则就会大乱,也就无法指望有序的知识创新。

关 键 词:学术剽窃  知识专利  个性崇拜  社会危害  自清原则  独立罪名  道德罪过

Academic Plagiarisin in History and Reality
LIU Dong.Academic Plagiarisin in History and Reality[J].Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2012,38(4):10-28.
Authors:LIU Dong
Institution:LIU Dong(The Institute of Chinese National Culture,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
Abstract:In fact,ancient society did not generally allow copying from others,if it could bring unfair reputation and interest to the plagiarists.In the modern society,in order to encourage knowledge innovation,the patent system based on the personality worship has to regard academic plagiarism as an independent offense.Therefore,although academic plagiarism is still a moral crime,it must be severely punished according to self-clearing principle of academic circle.
Keywords:academic plagiarism  knowledge patent  personality worship  social harm  self-cleaning principle  independent offence  moral crime
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号