| 对交通肇事罪司法解释中共同犯罪规定的解读与评价 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 秦兰英. 对交通肇事罪司法解释中共同犯罪规定的解读与评价[J]. 惠州学院学报, 2005, 25(1): 66-70. DOI: |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 秦兰英 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 惠州学院政法系,广东,惠州,516007 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 《刑法》第25 条规定, 共同犯罪只能是2 人以上共同故意犯罪, 2 人以上共同过失犯罪, 不以共同犯罪论处。交通肇事罪为过失犯罪, 而最高人民法院关于交通肇事罪的《解释》中却有两处规定了交通肇事罪的共同犯罪, 其直接与《刑法》第25 条的规定相冲突, 属于越权解释, 并背离了罪刑法定的基本原则。
|
| 关 键 词： | 司法解释 交通肇事 过失犯罪 共同犯罪 越权解释 |
| 文章编号： | 1671-5934(2005)01-0066-05 |
| 收稿时间： | 2004-06-21 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-06-21 |
Analysis and Evaluation of Joint Crimes in Interpretation of Traffic Crime by Supreme Court |
| |
| QIN lan-ying. Analysis and Evaluation of Joint Crimes in Interpretation of Traffic Crime by Supreme Court[J]. Journal of Huizhou University, 2005, 25(1): 66-70. DOI: |
| |
| Authors: | QIN lan-ying |
| |
| Abstract: | Article 25 of the Criminal Law defines a joint crime as refering to an intentional crime committed by two or more persons jointly. A negligent crime committed by two or more persons jointly shall not be punished as a joint crime. Although it is a negligent crime , traffic crime is exemplified as joint crimes twice in the interpretation of traffic crime by Supreme Court.This fails to be consistent with the elements of joint crimes constituted in article 25 of the Criminal Law. Thus it overreaches its authority and has violated the principle of that crimes, and punishments are all stipulated by law. |
| |
| Keywords: | Legal interpretation traffic crime negligent crimes joint crimes an overreaching interpretation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《惠州学院学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《惠州学院学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
