地方政府新增建设用地出让互动影响及区域差异

具有中国特色的地方政府土地出让行为,对中国经济发展举足轻重,其消极影响也广受诟病,因此受到学者广泛关注;其研究视角逐渐从单一地方政府层面上升到地方政府之间的互动影响。本文区分存量建设用地,基于空间计量模型和中国土地市场网2007—2016年279个地级市新增建设用地数据,分析其区域、用途差异,考察地方政府出让新增建设用地的互动影响。主要得出以下研究结论：①地方政府出让新增建设用地存在显著互动影响,并在区域和用途方面存在显著差异;②从区域差异看,地方政府出让新增建设用地的互动影响在东部地区尤其明显;③从用途差异看,地方政府出让新增建设用地的互动影响在商服和工业用途更显著;④按照传统的经济区域划分方法,划分东、中、西、东北等区域分别分析区域内部新增建设用地的互动影响,会导致各个区域的互动影响系数均小于全国整体的平均水平。本文为中央政府调控建设用地扩张提供了更精准的政策抓手,可以优先重点调控：①新增建设用地;②东部地区;③商服和工业用地。本文对未来土地出让互动影响及区域差异的相关研究具有重要的借鉴意义,并指出了下一步切实可行的研究方向。

Interaction effect of local government transferring newly-increased construction land and its regional difference

Local government land transfer behavior plays an important role in China’s economic development, and its negative impact is also widely criticized. Therefore, it has attracted much attention of scholars and the research focus has gradually changed from individual local government level to the effects of interaction among local governments. This study distinguished the stock construction land, examined the interaction effect of local government transferring newly-increased construction land, and analyzed its regional differences and usage differences in order to comprehensively understand and form targeted regulations of newly-increased construction land transfer behavior. The empirical analysis of the data of 279 prefecture-level cities from 2007 to 2016 based on the spatial econometric model generated the following conclusions: (1) Local governments transferring newly-increased construction land exist significant interaction influence; (2) Regionally, the interaction effect of local government transferring newly-increased construction land is particularly obvious in the eastern region; (3) With regard to land-use types, the interaction effect of local government transferring newly-increased construction land is more obvious in commercial and industrial land; (4) Based on the traditional method of regional division, dividing the eastern, central, western, and northeast regions to analyze the interaction effect of local government transferring newly-increased construction land in different regions, respectively, will result in the interaction coefficient of each region being smaller than the national average. This article provides a more precise policy implication for the central government to regulate the expansion of construction land, which should focus on the following key areas: (1) newly-increased construction land; (2) eastern region; (3) commercial and industrial land. This study provides some important reference for future research on the interaction effect of local government transferring construction land and its regional differences.